Do Men Prefer Debt-free Tattoo-less Virgins?

Do Men Prefer Debt-free Tattoo-less Virgins?

In a nutshell, yes.  Now I know some of you are going to get triggered, so I am going to stop you right here. Buzz off, buzz off now and you will not get triggered. This article is based on an article written on a Christian website by a woman (


So, this should be obvious, why would a man want to marry a woman with lots of debt unless she had lots of assets for that debt. He will not unless he is rich and stupid. Men usually support women and take on their debt. A man who willing wants to take on a woman’s debt is not a man, he is a pussy-whipped mangina, period. PERIOD.


What about tattoos? Traditionally, pirates, sailors and bad boys had tattoos. Today people have tattoos, so they can come off as bad boys or ‘cool’, that is unless they are pirates or sailors (any military forces also).  Why do women want tattoos? I don’t really know. To be cool? To be a bad girl? To revolt? The ugliest thing I have ever seen is a woman with a ‘Mom and Dad’ tattoo on her arm, or an anchor. I honestly think women who get these types of tattoos have a mental defect and I am not saying this as an insult. I believe this.


The mental defect thing is that the woman want’s to be a man, is a feminist or is a lesbian or heaven forbid, all the above (shoot me point blank in the head now please). Another huge turn off is when women staple earning or studs all over their bodies as if they are a heavy-metal leather jacket. I know many younger people are going to disagree with this, and I have the privilege of knowing you ARE going to change your minds as you get older, so I will gracefully ignore any of your silly arguments regarding this statement.

Finally, the virgin thing. At the beginning of this article I stated “in a nutshell” which insinuates that there may be some leeway regarding the statement, and yes there is. Instead of virgin I would perhaps modify that word to virgin-like. What I mean by this is perhaps 5 or less sexual partners. Now no one in their right mind is going to ask a woman how many people she slept with and expect her not to lie. However, it should be somewhat easy to figure out. Does she easily have sex with you?

Now many men do indeed love to have sex with women who are not virgins, who have lots of tattoos and who have a ton of debt. I do not think anyone would argue with this. However, these women are not for marrying, they are for smash and dash, pump and dump, hit it and quit it or any other derogatory statement we can come up with.  They are not for marrying.

Now with that said, it should be known that the author of this article does not think marriage has any good thing to offer a man at all unless that man wants to be emasculated by a woman, the legal system or both. It could be that as this is becoming the prevalent thought process of men, to not get married that women have begun to not care about debt, tattoos and virgin-like statuses.

I also get a chuckle when I hear a woman say, “where have all the good men gone?” as the answer to this is obviously where you are not. The question should be changed not to where have all the good women gone, but to are there any good women?

In conclusion, I find the statement a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle erroneous as it should be obvious that a man needs a woman like a fish needs a hook.


Is Justin Trudeau a Disingenuous Prick?

Is Justin Trudeau a Disingenuous Prick?


Mac Daddy Justin Trudeau who has recently been accused of sexual assault regarding his behavior with a young lady reporter in British Columbia when he was younger is once again finding himself on the stinky end of a stick that has poked its way through endless piles of feces. The beleaguered PM has been uncharacteristically quiet regarding the shooting in Toronto July 22, 2018, in which 15 people were shot and injured with two females being murdered, one being a 10-year old.


On January 5, 2018, Trudeau promptly chastised Canadians stating that “Canada is an open and welcoming country and incidents like this cannot be tolerated.” This statement was in response to a 11-year old’s claim that an Asian man attacked her and cut her hijab while walking home from school. The entire incident was a lie.


As the attack was on a Muslim girl, Trudeau’s virtue signally anti-islamicphobic feminism kicked into full swing. However, regarding this recent attack by a Muslim Canadians have found the PM mute with no official response leaving one of Trudeau’s former fans from Toronto to heckle the PM calling him a disingenuous prick.

The problem is that even though the criticism seems to be harsh, many tend to agree with the sentiments. My question to you is, do you think Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is a disingenuous prick?




Can Women Choose to do Whatever they Want?

Can Women Choose to do Whatever they Want?

I hear it everywhere in the media, in the streets and at the universities I participate at, women can be and do whatever they want. Should men ever standup and say no, enough is enough?

Firstly, I do not think men or rather traditionally ‘masculine’ men think they can do and be whatever they want. I believe that traditional men understand they have realistic limits. I do think we can expand on limits, but I also think we have limitations. I like to dream that we can do anything or that at some point in time we will be able to do anything like being able to fly, read minds and live for 1,000 years.

With that said, the current attitude that women espouse, that women can do anything is a nice platitude but if taken seriously, then very naïve. If women were to collectively decide they did not want to have children, should men stand up and say enough is enough? If women collectively decided to not bear children would it be OK for men to forcibly impregnate and imprison women until that time, not so far in the future mind you, that men no longer need women to have children?

Currently there is an artificial womb and artificial eggs and it will soon (within 50 years or less) be able to have children without the need of women.  However, the question still stands, if women collectively decided to not have babies would it be acceptable for men to impregnate women against their will and imprison them until their baby was safely born?

I am very interested in your opinions and comments. Thank you.

Do you Have Free Speech?

Do you Have Free Speech?

Firstly, if you do not live in the US then you are not guaranteed free speech. Many people do not realize that the US is the only, the ONLY country on earth that is guaranteed free speech. Even if you do live in the US you are aware that free speech is under attack. I do not agree with the concept of hate speech. Love and hate are subjective terms and you either have free speech or you do not. Hate speech laws are opposed to free speech.

Is some speech offensive? Yes. But being offensive, even though we called crimes offenses, is not a crime. Oddly, one of the things that the concept of free speech does is bring people with opposing views together in a bid to protect free speech. What I mean is even though I might not agree with your view points, specifically what you say, I will fight to the end for your right to say it.

Tommy Robinson was released from prison yesterday in London and his contempt finding was tossed out of court. I suspect his initial charge which allowed police to arrest him for doing nothing a month ago will also be thrown out as I am of the understanding that that charge is also being appealed, however, I might be wrong with that statement.

I find that England’s law where you are not allowed to comment on an ongoing trial has good intent where every person should have a fair trial, however the implementation where the entire population of a country is not allowed to comment or talk about a current trial which is contemporary culture is draconian. A fair trial can easily be afforded to any defendant by sequestering the jury.

I believe that implementation of law in England recently is not to uphold the law but to manipulate and subjugate the citizenry and intimidate people. We see this more and more as the left manipulations laws, regulations and media with the classifying of many conservatives in England as persona non grata such as was done with Lauren Southern.

Free speech is so much more important than some persons subjective feelings. Snowflakes melt over time and free speech should not.

Is the Middle Class Disappearing in America?

Is the Middle Class Disappearing in America?


In 1970, about 15% of US households earned today’s equivalent of $15,000 US income or less. 11% earned the equivalent today of $15,00 to $25,000 income, 11% earned $25,000 to $35,000 income, 17% earned $35,000 to $50,000 income. The largest demographic at 24% earned $50,000 to $75.000, 12% earned $75,000 to $100,000, 7% earned $100,000 to $150,000, 2% earned $150,000 to $200,000 and about 1% earned over $200,000.   All the figures above are adjusted for inflation.


In 1980, we seen slight declines in the under $15,000 group, the $35,000 to $50,000 group and the $50,000 to $75,000 group.


The $15,000, to $25,000 group, the $25,000 to $35, 000 group, the $75,000 to $100,000, the $100,000 to $150,000, the $150,000 to $200,000 and the over $200,000 groups all seen slight increases in the percentages of households occupying those demographics.

In 1990, we seen decreases in the number of households occupying the first 5 groups. The $75,000 to $100,000 group remained the same and the $100,000 to $150,000 group, the $150,000 to $200,000, and the over $200,000 groups all seen increases in the representation of households occupying those demographics.

In 2000, we seen the first 5 groups decline, the 6th remain the same and the last three gain household representation identical to the 1990 data.

In 2010, the first three groups seen an increase for the first time in 30 years of household representation, the 4th and 5th groups seen a decrease in household representations, and the 6th, 7th , 8th and 9th groups seen increases in house hold reorientation.

In 2013, the first three groups remained the same, the 4th groups increased a little, the 5th and 6th groups remained the same, the 7th group degreased while the 8th and 9th groups increased slightly.

A pattern emerges amongst the poorest or lowest income groups as we see far fewer households occupying those demographics over time than in 1970.

Amongst the middle-income group there are fewer households than in 1970. Therefore, the middle class is shrinking and disappearing.

However, the poor classes are also shrinking and disappearing. At this point it must be noted that from 1970 to the present the trend is that over time and adjusting for inflation, Americans are leaving the poor income groups, they are leaving the middle-income group and appearing in the rich groups. Of course, there are exceptions to this, the truth is that the middle class is disappearing. It is joining the upper classes.