Work Smarter not Harder
Yes, one of the best and easiest ways to buy crypto with your Thai bank account is with Thailand’s most popular crypto exchange Bitcoin Exchange. I am not sure if they allow Americans to sign up as the US government has enforced so much regulation that vendors do not want and will not put up with the hassle of appeasing the American Government here in Thailand and why should they.
Again, you can hook up your Thai bank account directly purchase crypto with BX.
Why do people pay different amounts of tax? It is often argued that taxes are gather for good causes such as schools, parks, roads, street lights, bridges and services that help keep us safe. Taxes are seen as something that has or at least had good intent. The reality is that most taxes are not necessary. Most taxes are implemented in order to make governments more relevant than they really are.
Do we really need large governments? Did we really need to pay $5 million to the National Institute of Health to realize that fraternities and sororities drink more on average than the overall university population particularly on days a big sporting event is held and that they sleep in later as well? Do we really need to pay $1 billion a year to pay more for sugar and artificially inflate sugar prices worldwide?
In reality, taxation is theft. Why else would two people who live in the same street, being the same age and gender, participating in the say activities and having the same family make up pay different amounts of tax? This is simple to answer, taxation is theft.
For example, let’s look at two men who are 30 years old who work at the same company doing the same job, shall we? The difference between these two men are that one man only wants to work 30 hours a week as this is his preference. The other man is more ambitious and chooses to work 50 hours a week. Why does the more ambitious man pay more tax for being more productive and ambitious? Again, the answer is simple. Taxation is theft.
Additionally, what taxes are spent on has become much less fair as well. Why is it that people who are literally getting ripped off via taxation not up in arms about this in this age of victim mentality? Why are some people not paying their fair share of taxes while others pay 10 times as much tax? Again, some spout on about fairness. Fairness is inseparable from unfairness just as equality is inseparable from inequality. Why can’t each and every one of us pay our fair share?
When you go into a store to buy a coke you pay the same for that coke as everyone else. If you had to pay a different amount whether more or less because of your gender, ethnicity or income level, then that would be theft and it is very easy to understand this as theft.
The government tells you what you are going t pay them from your hard-earned cash and if you do not pay it, then they will come knocking at your door and either take that money from you by pointing the end of a gun at you, physically confiscate your property or physically take you to jail. When you look at this system objectively, it is very easy to see that the government are thieves and overtly act like thugs.
One of the things I cherish with Steemit being red-pilled is I see things the way I see things and that is usually contradictory to the way many if not most all other people see things. For instance, some see marriage as the pinnacle of relationships and I see it as useless, harmful and emasculating. I must mention that this is not a Steemit thing but a societal thing. I usually am at odds with some mainstream ideas, understandings and acceptances.
Most users on Steemit are self-centered and selfish. I do not mean this as an insult but just as an observation. I am a user of Steemit and I am just as guilty. Users on Steemit mostly care about themselves and their articles, and that’s if they even bothered to write an article and not steal it or plagiarize it. Most users just post pictures. Many of those pictures are not even theirs. So, I guess we could add lazy and thieves to the list of characteristics too. Now, that is not to say that all users of Steemit display these characteristics, they do not. Just many if not most of them.
One can earn via Steemit, but that is not my purpose. One can get views via Steemit users, but, again that is not my purpose. I do get many hits for my articles. Why do I get views? Because I offer an alternative view or a different view from most people’s echo chambers.
Additionally, my viewpoint tends to trigger many people. I do not try to trigger people; people’s fragility seems to increase with each new generation exponentially. I tend to question the status quo, especially if it just rubs up against me the wrong way. My main goal is the pursuit of truth.
Anyone can view my articles on Steemit and I promote my articles. Many people come to my articles and want to spam the heck out of me and my opinion. Aaannnnttt. Not gonna happen. Why? Because you need to be a member of Steemit to comment and upvote.
I tend to trigger feminists, femininazis (sorry Nazis), leftists, manginas, white knights, simpletons, beta males and anybody else who is not red-pilled. These types read my articles or a few words of my articles and then freak and say, “I am going to show him.” However, then they cannot spew their feelings all over my comments unless they join Steemit. We, here at Steemit, know that takes a week at least to join and they these types do not have very long attention spans.
Additionally, if they do, by chance, join Steemit, and we all know they do not, but, if they were to, then they would try and use their well-honed tools of complaining and moaning and whining and bitching and protesting to get my articles removed and my account terminated. That is where the blockchain comes into play. What a wonderfully named technology. Block the chain of whining cry babies from muting your voice and ideas. The blockchain is permanent and you can’t delete my articles, try as you might. The only thing they can do is write their own articles and develop their own ideas in a logical, persuasive manner as to sway people to “come over to the dark side”. That is useless and a waste of their time, however, they are willing to waste their time, that is not the issue. The issue is it is useless.
People do not go from the center or the right to the left. That does not happen. Well, unless they are a mangina or white knight and are trying to get some tang, then they might.
I like Steemit because I get the first word, the last word and every other word in between no matter what your proclivity, be it male feminist, leftist, feminazi or dummy.
Gretel Smetel’s recent letter in these pages “No women allowed out after dark”? What a Totally. Awesome. Idea. I have, quite genuinely, been racking my brain as to what we can realistically do to ensure women’s safety after dark.
Demanding safe passage at all hours, regardless of where we are, what we’re wearing, or our blood-alcohol level is all very well but that is never going to happen, no matter how much “education” there is. There are always going to be random drunken women who dress like sluts who walk down dangerous areas on a whim, oblivious to safety out there.
So how do we shift responsibility for women’s safety from the entire population to the individual women?
Adding her bit to the debate – and in response to the suggestion from yet another letter-writer that men shouldn’t walk alone at night – Mz. Smetel came up with perhaps the most practical and efficient solution yet. A curfew on women. Genius.
Under the new regime any women out after dark would have to be accompanied by a responsible male.
There are a number of options. One is simply to ban all women from being on the streets or on public transport after, say, 9.30pm (10.30pm daylight saving). Which is effectively the restriction currently placed on men.
As males, once we’re out and about after dark, post-peak hour, we all know we’re in potential danger. So, let’s shift the burden back on to the birds – who certainly could be at large after curfew if they chose to but would know they’re at constant risk of being caught and spending the night in lock-up. (Which, in the scheme of things, still isn’t as bad as the risk of being accused as a rapist and murderer.)
But how about when I want to, say, go out and have dinner or a few drinks with female friends? Well, right now, at the conclusion of an evening’s festivities one or more of my female companions see me safely into a taxi. But under the new regime any women out after dark would have to be accompanied by a responsible male, and escorted in person to appropriate transport. It’s completely do-able. I can attest to it. I’ve been doing it for decades.
Same rules for any chick who works nights.
And if you can’t afford a taxi or an Uber or arrange for a friend to collect you? Well, ladies, you’d have to take your chances, just as the gentlemen currently do. (See above re risk of arrest and imprisonment v risk of gruesome, terrifying life-threatening accusations.)
I know it sounds untenable when the bare bones are laid out like this but I – and every other man in Canada – can assure you that it’s irritating, sure, but you do get used to it. Eventually it’ll become second nature.
And I know now the idea is out there – and given the passion of our political leaders for law and order and keeping us all safe – draft legislation can’t be far away.
Melanoma Whoston, who is a fucking insane media contributor, originally wrote this article on 9 July 2018, however, this version has switched genders for everyone to see how ridiculous and misandrist not only women, but the media in general, has become. If you would like to see what the publisher of this articles means, please view the original article here:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/a-curfew-for-men-what-a-great-idea-20180709-p4zqev.html
